All News & Blogs
Gloria May 18, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I'd be interested to know what COMPANIES are the ones who have been hiring, per this article. We…Read More always read how there is a "job growth" in CT, yet no actual companies are ever listed (who are the ones hiring???) -- and yet there is still the unemployment rate of 8% for Connecticut...
Tom Santos May 17, 2013 at 11:56 pm
Who is the fool that wants to blow $9 million dollars renumbering exit signs that have stood since…Read More the mid 60s? AS I understand it, the new exit numbers will correspond to the mile markers. So if the mile maker is 9.2, the exit number near that marker will be exit 9. However, the next exit is at marker 12.5, and the exit will be exit 13. Does that make sense? Who is going to pay for all the redesigning of the maps, the business owners who have spent thousands of dollars preparing literature showing which exit to take to get to their stores? As usual, the government wants to fix something that's not broken, and make it worse. The real problems don't get fixed. Get ready, next it'll be saying "we spent so much money renumbering all the highway exits, now we have to raise your taxes to pay the bill".
Corey Sipe May 17, 2013 at 10:16 pm
That's a good question. I assume it will show up as exit 9 once the new markers are installed but…Read More that's up to the GPS manufacturer to be aware of the change and reflect it on their software. However, it will only show up as exit 9 for for folks who update their GPS systems by plugging it into their computer and running update software. Many forget to update their systems regularly. The signs will be even more confusing as it will say "Exit 9: Old Exit 79A". I have seen those signs when PA highways did the changeover and it severely confuses those unfamiliar with the area the most. "Welcome to CT: Now It's time to Get Confused As We Call An Exit 2 Different Numbers For No Good Reason!"
Lyme To Vote On Budget And Hear a Progress Report on Town…
0 Recommend Jayne Keedle (Editor)