.
Feedback

A Landmark Decision—But It May Not Amount to Much

Last night, East Lyme Zoning Commission approved changes to regulations in accordance with a court order resulting from a suit brought by Landmark Development, but the changes may be more cosmetic than substantive.

 

East Lyme Zoning Commission approved changes to regulations regarding affordable housing last night. The changes were made in accordance with a court order following Landmark Development's successful appeal of the board's partial acceptance and partial denial of its application for an affordable housing development in Oswegatchie Hills. 

Landmark proposes to construct 840 housing units, of which 252 would be affordable housing units adjacent to Caulkins Road in East Lyme. While the court remand was a victory for Landmark, attorneys for the town said the changes were mostly semantic. 

The most substantive difference reduces the buffer zone between new housing developments and existing housing developments from 100 feet to 25 feet. The Zoning Commission, however, opted not to change the 150 feet buffer zone between new developments and tidal wetlands and watercourses as Landmark had suggested.

This particular rule doesn't actually apply to Landmark's proposal, which would construct new housing more than 1,000 feet from any coastal or wetland area. Wetlands and coastal areas are regulated by Inland-Wetlands and Watercourses Commissions and typically fall within the purview of Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and the state's Coastal Area Management Act, and not the Zoning Commission, which may have little to no jurisdiction in this area.  

However, Superior Court Judge Stephen Frazzini, who remanded the case back to the Zoning Commission with orders to make adjustments to the regulations, had noted that affordable housing developments were still subject to existing environmental, developmental, health, and public safety regulations and all of those concerns could be handled at the discretion of the zoning commission.

Save the River, Save the Hills, and Friends of Oswegatchie Hills, two nonprofit organizations that are intervenors in this case, are opposed to Landmark's housing development plans based on the possible impact that a high density housing estate would have on the environmentally fragile Niantic River and the surrounding area.  

Other Changes Coming

The new rules will require affordable housing developers to submit conceptual, preliminary, or final site plans. That's a change from previous regulations that required plans to be submitted in stages but, as the final site plan must include all the same elements as a preliminary plan and with much greater detail, developers will still need to cover all the same bases as before. The change should, however, make it less costly for developers, who could save money by exercising their option to submit fewer site plans. 

Open space, and whether the town needed to increase its open space requirements for high-density developments, was an issue raised at the public hearings held prior to this decision. As the topic was not included in the public notices posted regarding the proposed regulations changes, the Zoning Commission could not make any decision on that score. The Zonng Commission does, however, plan to take up that issue at a later date.  

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from The Lymes Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jayne Keedle (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 11:53 pm
I wondered that myself when I looked at it, then noticed that lots of our local farmers marketsRead More aren't on the map. When I dug a little deeper, I noticed that all the markets the state lists are "self-reported" in other words, markets have to let the state know and then they're added.
Monica Rae Sistare May 19, 2013 at 10:16 pm
As a parent of 2 children that attend NCS, I do not think the elementary school is the best place toRead More relocate Coastal Connection to. I feel that beyond my concerns, my children may feel threatened or uncomfortable in a school with kids that are so much older than they are. It just doesn't seem like this would be the best decision for any of the children that would be affected by this change.